Metropolitan Police detectives have announced the conclusion of their role in the criminal investigation into bets placed on the General Election date. The investigation was initiated after it was discovered that bets had been made on the election date, with a focus on possible misconduct in public office.
The Gambling Commission inquiry also caught up a number of Conservatives, including Craig Williams, a former parliamentary aide to Rishi Sunak. Williams, who was the MP for Montgomeryshire at the time, had placed a £100 bet on a July election.
In June, it was determined that the Gambling Commission would look into bets potentially breaching the Gambling Act 2005. The Met investigated bets not only suspected of violating this legislation but also potentially involving offences like Misconduct in Public Office. Following consultation with the CPS and the Gambling Commission, only a small number of cases fell into the second category.
After reviewing the evidence and seeking advice from the CPS, the Met concluded that the threshold for Misconduct in Public Office was not met. However, the Gambling Commission will continue its investigation into Gambling Act offences. Cases will now be handed over to the Gambling Commission for further scrutiny.
Detective Superintendent Katherine Goodwin stressed that despite the Met ending its involvement in criminal matters, ongoing Gambling Act offences would be pursued by the Gambling Commission. Seven police officers allegedly involved in placing bets remain under investigation by both the Gambling Commission and the Met’s Directorate of Professional Standards.
Andrew Rhodes, chief executive of the Gambling Commission, highlighted the progress of their criminal investigation into unfair advantage related to betting on the election date. Interviews under caution have been conducted, and further evidence is being gathered to ensure a fair outcome.
The Gambling Commission retains the authority to commence criminal proceedings for any identified offences under the Gambling Act 2005. While there is public interest in the case, the Commission refrains from commenting further to protect the integrity of the investigation and ensure a just outcome.